A STRUCTURAL MODEL OF DRINKING AND DRIVING: ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION, SOCIAL NORMS, AND MORAL COMMITMENTS*
- 1 February 1986
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Criminology
- Vol. 24 (1) , 139-154
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1986.tb00380.x
Abstract
A structural model based upon data from a random sample of 1,000 U.S. drivers accounted for 56% of the variation in alcohol‐impaired driving, with total monthly alcohol consumption as the strongest predictor. Significant contributions of age, sex, peer group values, and preference for beer suggested the operation of socialization to group norms. There was a substantial contribution of personal moral commitment against drinking and driving. However, there was no significant inhibitory influence of legal knowledge and perceived arrest risk. These findings are consistent with Andenaes's view that general deterrence should be more broadly construed to include the moral component as well as the fear component of the lawKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Alcoholic beverage preferences of drinking-driving violators.Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 1985
- Controlling the alcohol-impaired driver in Scandinavia and the United States: Simple deterrence and beyondJournal of Criminal Justice, 1984
- The deterioration of deterrence effects of driving legislation: Have we been giving wrong signals to policymakers?Journal of Criminal Justice, 1984
- Deterrence: A Panel AnalysisJustice Quarterly, 1984
- Perceived Risk and Social Control: Do Sanctions Really Deter?Law & Society Review, 1983
- Adolescents' drinking and perceptions of legal and informal sanctions. A test of four hypotheses.Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 1980
- Drug and Drinking Behavior Among YouthAnnual Review of Sociology, 1980
- Toward a Theory of Criminal DeterrenceAmerican Sociological Review, 1976
- Perceived Penal Sanction and Self-Reported Criminality: A Neglected Approach to Deterrence ResearchSocial Problems, 1972
- More plausible rival hypotheses in the cross-lagged panel correlation technique.Psychological Bulletin, 1969