The institutional foundations of hegemony: explaining the Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act of 1934
- 1 January 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in International Organization
- Vol. 42 (1) , 91-119
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300007141
Abstract
In 1930, Congress approved the highly restrictive Smoot–Hawley tariff, the textbook case of pressure group politics run amok. Four years later, Congress passed the Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act (RTAA), surrendering much of its tariff-making authority to a policy process in which internationalists had increasing influence. While the United States had used reciprocity to expand exports before, the stick of discriminatory treatment took precedence over the carrot of liberalizing concessions. With the transfer of tariff-making authority to the executive, the United States could make credible commitments and thus exploit its market power to liberalize international trade. Despite later modifications, the RTAA set the fundamental institutional framework for trade politics.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- American Trade Politics: System under StressForeign Affairs, 1987
- Beneath the Commerce of Nations: A Theory of International Economic StructuresInternational Studies Quarterly, 1984
- Trade and Hemisphere: The Good Neighbor Policy and Reciprocal Trade.Hispanic American Historical Review, 1976
- Sources of New Deal Economic Policy: The International DimensionJournal of American History, 1974
- American Business and Foreign Policy, 1920-1933The American Historical Review, 1974
- Roosevelt's 1933 Monetary ExperimentJournal of American History, 1971
- The American Business Creed.The Economic Journal, 1957
- Barriers to World Trade, A Study of Recent Commercial Policy.Published by JSTOR ,1941
- DiaryTubercle, 1933
- Privileges of PhysiciansBMJ, 1845