A Simple Trade‐off Model for Maximal and Multiple Coverage
- 1 July 1988
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Geographical Analysis
- Vol. 20 (3) , 220-230
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1988.tb00177.x
Abstract
A natural slack model, which allows for the trade‐off of single coverage of demand for multiple coverage, is developed in this paper. Locational options structured within this multiobjective perspective extend from the most dispersed pattern possible (i.e., the maximal covering solution) to the most clustered (i.e., the multiple covering solution). It is believed that this extension of the location covering approach can better inform decision makers who must address questions of spatial and temporal access to services. A numerical example, demonstrating the use of the model and the identification of the noninferior set of siting choices, is suggested and solved.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Satisficing solutions to infeasible set partitionsEnvironment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 1987
- Determining Emergency Medical Service Vehicle Deployment in Austin, TexasInterfaces, 1985
- Slack, natural slack, and location coveringSocio-Economic Planning Sciences, 1982
- STRATEGIC FACILITY PLANNING: THE ANALYSIS OF OPTIONSDecision Sciences, 1982
- Behaviorally linked location hierarchiesEnvironment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 1982
- DYNAMIC LOCATION MODELING FOR PUBLIC‐SECTOR FACILITIES: A MULTICRITERIA APPROACH*Decision Sciences, 1980
- A goal programming model for the siting of multilevel EMS systemsSocio-Economic Planning Sciences, 1980
- The Team/Fleet Models for Simultaneous Facility and Equipment SitingTransportation Science, 1979
- The maximal covering location problemPapers in Regional Science, 1974
- THE MAXIMAL COVERING LOCATION PROBLEMPapers in Regional Science, 1974