Meteorite Orbits from Observations by Camera Networks
- 1 January 1983
- journal article
- other
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Highlights of Astronomy
- Vol. 6, 399-404
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s1539299600005396
Abstract
Camera networks for the study of bright fireballs now have a history approaching two decades• It was hoped that the networks would produce a statistically significant group of recovered meteorites with accurate orbits. Due to the great difficulty in locating the meteorites from a photographed event, there are still only three meteorites with orbits determined from suitable photographs; Pribram, Lost City and Innisfree (Ceplecha I96I, McCrosky et al. 1971, Halliday et al. 1978, respectively). Networks do, however, provide an alternative approach to the problem. Instead of determining approximate orbits from visual observations of recovered meteorite falls, it is now preferable to use reliable orbits from the camera networks for fireballs which are believed to have dropped meteorites that could not be located, or, that are believed to have been physically identical to meteorites, although no appreciable mass survived the atmospheric flight. This paper will review current knowledge based on this approach to the problem.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Which fireballs are meteorites? A study of the Prairie Network photographic meteor dataIcarus, 1981
- METEORITE FALLS AND FINDS: SOME STATISTICSMeteoritics, 1981
- Estimates of total quantity of meteorites in the East Antarctic ice capNature, 1981
- THE INNISFREE METEORITE FALL: A PHOTOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF FRAGMENTATION, DYNAMICS AND LUMINOSITYMeteoritics, 1981
- TechnologyPhysics Bulletin, 1977
- Fireball end heights: A diagnostic for the structure of meteoric materialJournal of Geophysical Research, 1976
- Lost City meteorite-Its recovery and a comparison with other fireballsJournal of Geophysical Research, 1971