Estimated fetal weights versus birth weights: should the reference intrauterine growth curves based on birth weights be retired?
Open Access
- 1 May 2007
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by BMJ in Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal & Neonatal
- Vol. 92 (3) , F161-F162
- https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2006.109439
Abstract
Perspective on the paper by Cooke (see page F189)Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Conventional birth weight standards obscure fetal growth restriction in preterm infantsArchives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal & Neonatal, 2007
- A New and Improved Population-Based Canadian Reference for Birth Weight for Gestational AgePediatrics, 2001
- A united states national reference for fetal growthPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2001
- Intrauterine growth curves based on ultrasonically estimated foetal weightsActa Paediatrica, 1996
- An Update of the Swedish Reference Standards for Weight, Length and Head Circumference at Birth for Given Gestational Age (1977‐1981)Acta Paediatrica, 1991
- Weight, length, and head circumference curves for boys and girls of between 20 and 42 weeks' gestation.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1988
- Intra‐Uterine Weight Curves Obtained by UltrasoundActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1986
- Revised intrauterine growth curves for an Australian hospital populationJournal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 1983
- Intrauterine growth of live-born Caucasian infants at sea level: Standards obtained from measurements in 7 dimensions of infants born between 25 and 44 weeksPublished by Elsevier ,1969
- A practical classification of newborn infants by weight and gestational ageThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1967