Why Are So Many Epidemiology Associations Inflated or Wrong? Does Poorly Conducted Animal Research Suggest Implausible Hypotheses?

This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:

• Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated
  Epidemiology, 2008
• Curses—Winner's and Otherwise—in Genetic Epidemiology
  Epidemiology, 2008
• Diet and cancer prevention: the roles of observation and experimentation
  Nature Reviews Cancer, 2008
• Statin use and the risk of prostate cancer: A metaanalysis of 6 randomized clinical trials and 13 observational studies
  International Journal of Cancer, 2008
• Methodological quality and homogeneity influenced agreement between randomized trials and nonrandomized studies of the same intervention for back pain
  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2008
• The scandal of poor epidemiological research: ***
  BMJ, 2004
• Looking to the 21st century: have we learned from our mistakes, or are we doomed to compound them?
  Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2004
• Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy: Lessons from Observational and Randomized Studies
  Endocrine, 2004
• Epidemiology—is it time to call it a day?
  International Journal of Epidemiology, 2001
• Epidemiology Faces Its Limits
  Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) ,1995