Organizational Environments in Flux: The Impact of Regulatory Punctuations on Organizational Domains, CEO Succession, and Performance
- 1 June 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS) in Organization Science
- Vol. 12 (3) , 253-273
- https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.3.253.10104
Abstract
A central debate in organizational theory concerns how organizations evolve. There are two diametrically opposing viewpoints. Adaptation theories predict that change occurs as fluid organizations adjust to meet shifting environmental demands, while selection theories predict that change occurs through the differential selection and replacement of inert organizations as environmental demands vary over time. Our paper bridges these polar opposites by using a punctuated equilibrium framework to examine organizations' responses to discontinuous industry-level change. This framework recognizes that the histories of many industries are occasionally punctuated by dramatic exogenous shocks, such as radical technological innovation, social and political turmoil, major changes in government regulation, and economic crashes. Our central thesis is that such environmental punctuations dramatically reduce pressures and rewards for organizational inertia and thereby alter both organizations' propensities for change and their survival chances following change. We focus on one form of punctuation, major regulatory change, and study firms in two industries: general hospitals and savings and loan associations. For organizations in both industries, we examine three important outcomes: shifts in organizational domain, CEO succession, and changes in financial performance. Our analyses show that punctuational regulatory change prompts shifts in organizational domains and executive leadership. Additionally, post-punctuation domain change and post-punctuation CEO succession both affect subsequent performance. We discuss our results in light of current thinking about the content and process effects of core organizational change, which has been developed in the context of stable environments. Finally, we argue for the development of more temporally sensitive theories of organizational action.Keywords
This publication has 61 references indexed in Scilit:
- The State, Courts, and Maternity Policies in U.S. Organizations: Specifying Institutional MechanismsAmerican Sociological Review, 1999
- Resetting the Clock: The Dynamics of Organizational Change and FailureAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1993
- INTERORGANIZATIONAL LINKAGES AND POPULATION-DYNAMICS - BUFFERING AND TRANSFORMATIONAL SHIELDSAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1990
- Legal Environments and Organizational Governance: The Expansion of Due Process in the American WorkplaceAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1990
- ORGANIZATIONAL ADAPTATION: SOME IMPLICATIONS OF ORGANIZATIONAL ECOLOGY FOR STRATEGIC CHOICE[1]Journal of Management Studies, 1988
- Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticityJournal of Econometrics, 1986
- Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of EmbeddednessAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1985
- The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational FieldsAmerican Sociological Review, 1983
- Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and CeremonyAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1977
- Nonlinear Regression with Autocorrelated ErrorsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1976