Instructional effects on responses in Wason's selection task
- 1 May 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Psychology
- Vol. 81 (2) , 197-204
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1990.tb02355.x
Abstract
This study examines the effects of three different violation instructions in the abstract selection task. Margolis (1987) hypothesized different selection patterns for each of these instructions. The results of Expt 1 supported all of his predictions, including one for a large number of not‐p and not‐q selections, an extremely infrequent choice for the abstract selection task. In Expt 2, the violation instruction leading to the not‐p and not‐q selections was used in an abstract permission schema selection task problem. In this case, it enhanced the facilitation normally observed for such problems instead of leading to not‐p and not‐q selections. The present results are discussed as support for attentional cueing models of reasoning, specifically Margolis's scenario/linguistic ambiguity theory and Evans's heuristic/analytic processing theory.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Schemata: The Building Blocks of CognitionPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2017
- Education and the selection taskBulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1988
- Heuristic and analytic processes in reasoning*British Journal of Psychology, 1984
- Linguistic Determinants of Bias in Conditional ReasoningThe Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 1983
- Reasoning about a RuleQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968