On the Failure to Detect Changes in Scenes Across Brief Interruptions
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Visual Cognition
- Vol. 7 (1-3) , 127-145
- https://doi.org/10.1080/135062800394720
Abstract
When brief blank fields are placed between alternating displays of an original and a modified scene, a striking failure of perception is induced: The changes become extremely difficult to notice, even when they are large, presented repeatedly, and the observer expects them to occur (Rensink, O'Regan, & Clark, 1997). To determine the mechanisms behind this induced “change blindness”, four experiments examine its dependence on initial preview and on the nature of the interruptions used. Results support the proposal that representations at the early stages of visual processing are inherently volatile, and that focused attention is needed to stabilize them sufficiently to support the perception of change.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- How Are Different Properties of a Scene Encoded in Visual Memory?Visual Cognition, 2000
- Transsaccadic Memory and Integration During Real-World Object PerceptionPsychological Science, 1997
- Transient—Sustained Input to Directionally Selective Motion MechanismsPerception, 1996
- Rapid colour-specific detection of motion in human visionNature, 1996
- Motion and metacontrast with simultaneous onset of stimuliJournal of the Optical Society of America A, 1995
- Hand-eye coordination during sequential tasksPhilosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 1992
- Information integration across saccadic eye movementsCognitive Psychology, 1991
- Temporal integration in visual memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1980
- Failure to detect displacement of the visual world during saccadic eye movementsVision Research, 1975
- The masking of apparent motion in random-dot patternsVision Research, 1973