Becoming More Efficient at Outcomes Research
- 1 October 1988
- journal article
- general essays
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
- Vol. 4 (4) , 555-571
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462300007625
Abstract
This paper discusses several practical problems in research design: Is it worth doing a relatively “quick and dirty” study or is a more thorough study using all available infotmation necessary? All the desired information may either not be available or be time-consuming to collect. What are the likely biases in going ahead and doing the research with the data base “in hand”? Such issues are important because of the limited resources for technology assessment (in terms of money, number of researchers, and research interest) and the great number of unstudies technologies.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is There a Role for Surgery in the Acute Management of Infectiue Endocarditis?Medical Decision Making, 1988
- The Appropriateness of Using a Medical ProcedureMedical Care, 1987
- Using administrative data for longitudinal research: Comparisons with primary data collectionJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987
- The Case For Adjusting Hospital Death Rates For Severity Of IllnessHealth Affairs, 1986
- Diagnosis Related Groups: Product Line Management within HospitalsAcademy of Management Review, 1986
- Institutional Responses to Prospective Payment Based on Diagnosis-Related GroupsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- Using economic analysis to determine the resource consequences of choices made in planning clinical trialsJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1985
- Data Bases, Data Banks and Data Dredging: The Agony and the EcstasyJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1984
- Will Payment Based on Diagnosis-Related Groups Control Hospital Costs?New England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Should Operations Be Regionalized?New England Journal of Medicine, 1979