Interpreting statistics in medical literature: A vade mecum for surgeons1
- 1 March 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of the American College of Surgeons
- Vol. 198 (3) , 441-458
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.09.017
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 52 references indexed in Scilit:
- Analysis and interpretation of treatment effects in subgroups of patients in randomized clinical trialsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1991
- Hospital Cost Containment in the 1980sNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- No Adjustments Are Needed for Multiple ComparisonsEpidemiology, 1990
- An Assessment of Clinically Useful Measures of the Consequences of TreatmentNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Statistical Problems in the Reporting of Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- A comparison of the logistic risk function and the proportional hazards model in prospective epidemiologic studiesJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1983
- Sample size requirements for comparing time-to-failure among k treatment groupsJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1982
- Clinical judgment and statistics. Lessons from a simulated randomized trial in coronary artery disease.Circulation, 1980
- A Show of ConfidenceNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- The Importance of Beta, the Type II Error and Sample Size in the Design and Interpretation of the Randomized Control TrialNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978