Strong and weak tests of macroecological theory
- 1 August 2003
- Vol. 102 (3) , 679-685
- https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12617.x
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- CorrespondenceJournal of Biogeography, 2002
- The species–area relationship does not have an asymptote!Journal of Biogeography, 2001
- Nested Species-Area Curves and Stochastic Sampling: A New TheoryOikos, 1997
- Zipf’s law, the central limit theorem, and the random division of the unit intervalPhysical Review E, 1996
- Temporal Patterns in the Herbivorous Insects of Bracken: A Test of Community PredictabilityJournal of Animal Ecology, 1989
- Dominance and Diversity Maintenance in an Oceanic EcosystemEcological Monographs, 1985
- Model Discrimination and Expected Slope Values in Species-Area StudiesThe American Naturalist, 1983
- S = CAz, z ≃ 1/4: A Reply to Connor and McCoyThe American Naturalist, 1981
- Alternate Derivations of a Species-Abundance RelationThe American Naturalist, 1968
- On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Normality with Mean and Variance UnknownJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1967