Multilevel Structured Documentation
- 1 April 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
- Vol. 31 (2) , 215-228
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001872088903100209
Abstract
This research examined the effects of different types of documentation on the performance of users with different levels of experience on a word-processing program. Three forms of documentation (global overview, detailed step-by-step, and combined global and detailed) were presented to undergraduates with high, medium, and low levels of computer experience. Dependent measures were problem-solving behavior using a word-processing program, the amount of information retained by the participants about the program, and subjective reactions to the documentation. The results indicated that (a) combined global and detailed documentation was, in general, superior to either type of documentation alone; (b) more experienced users were superior in reading documentation more quickly and solving problems more quickly, but they did not have significantly better recall or recognition of components of the program; and (c) the effects of type of documentation did not interact with the level of user's experience.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Documentation of Concurrent ProgramsHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1985
- Roadmaps versus Roadsigns: Which is the Better Metalanguage?Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, 1982
- A theoretical analysis of the role of documentation in the comprehension of computer programsPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,1982
- Indentation, documentation and programmer comprehensionPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,1982
- Steps toward a cognitive engineeringPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,1982
- Modern Coding Practices and Programmer PerformanceComputer, 1979