MUTUAL MATE CHOICE AND SEX DIFFERENCES IN CHOOSINESS
Open Access
- 1 August 1996
- Vol. 50 (4) , 1382-1391
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03912.x
Abstract
Sexual competition is associated closely with parental care because the sex providing less care has a higher potential rate of reproduction, and hence more to gain from competing for multiple mates. Sex differences in choosiness are not easily explained, however. The lower‐caring sex (often males) has both higher costs of choice, because it is more difficult to find replacement mates, and higher direct benefits, because the sex providing more care (usually females) is likely to exhibit more variation in the quality of contributions to the young. Because both the costs and direct benefits of mate choice increase with increasing parental care by the opposite sex, general predictions about sex difference in choosiness are difficult. Furthermore, the level of choosiness of one sex will be influenced by the choosiness of the other. Here, we present an ESS model of mutual mate choice, which explicitly incorporates differences between males and females in life history traits that determine the costs and benefits of choice, and we illustrate our results with data from species with contrasting forms of parental care. The model demonstrates that sex differences in costs of choice are likely to have a much stronger effect on choosiness than are differences in quality variation, so that the less competitive sex will commonly be more choosy. However, when levels of male and female care are similar, differences in quality variation may lead to higher levels of both choice and competition in the same sex.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sexual coercion in animal societiesAnimal Behaviour, 1995
- Sexual SelectionPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1994
- FEMALE REPRODUCTIVE EFFORT DEPENDS ON THE DEGREE OF ORNAMENTATION OF THEIR MATESEvolution, 1993
- Potential Reproductive Rates and the Operation of Sexual SelectionThe Quarterly Review of Biology, 1992
- The Evolution of Parental CarePublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1991
- Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and femalesNature, 1991
- Mate Density, Predation Risk, and the Seasonal Sequence of Mate Choices: A Dynamic GameThe American Naturalist, 1991
- Ecology, Sexual Selection, and the Evolution of Mating SystemsScience, 1977
- The Lek System in Uganda Kob AntelopeAmerican Zoologist, 1974
- Intra-sexual selection in DrosophilaHeredity, 1948