A Comparison of Frailty Indexes for the Prediction of Falls, Disability, Fractures, and Mortality in Older Men
Top Cited Papers
- 3 March 2009
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Vol. 57 (3) , 492-498
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02137.x
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare the validity of a parsimonious frailty index (components: weight loss, inability to rise from a chair, and poor energy (Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) index)) with that of the more complex Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) index (components: unintentional weight loss, low grip strength, poor energy, slowness, and low physical activity) for prediction of adverse outcomes in older men.DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.SETTING: Six U.S. centers.PARTICIPANTS: Three thousand one hundred thirty‐two men aged 67 and older.MEASUREMENTS: Frailty status categorized as robust, intermediate stage, or frail using the SOF index and criteria similar to those used in CHS index. Falls were reported three times for 1 year. Disability (≥1 new impairments in performing instrumental activities of daily living) ascertained at 1 year. Fractures and deaths ascertained during 3 years of follow‐up. Analysis of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) statistics compared for models containing the SOF index versus those containing the CHS index.RESULTS: Greater evidence of frailty as defined by either index was associated with greater risk of adverse outcomes. Frail men had a higher age‐adjusted risk of recurrent falls (odds ratio (OR)=3.0–3.6), disability (OR=5.3–7.5), nonspine fracture (hazard ratio (HR)=2.2–2.3), and death (HR=2.5–3.5) (P<.001 for all models). AUC comparisons revealed no differences between models with the SOF index and models with the CHS index in discriminating falls (AUC=0.63, P=.97), disability (AUC=0.68, P=.86), nonspine fracture (AUC=0.63, P=.90), or death (AUC=0.71 for model with SOF index and 0.72 for model with CHS index, P=.19).CONCLUSION: The simple SOF index predicts risk of falls, disability, fracture, and mortality in men as well as the more‐complex CHS index.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- FrailtyBiological Research For Nursing, 2012
- Physical Performance and Risk of Hip Fractures in Older MenJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2008
- Frailty and Risk of Falls, Fracture, and Mortality in Older Women: The Study of Osteoporotic FracturesThe Journals of Gerontology: Series A, 2007
- Frailty in Older Men: Prevalence, Progression, and Relationship with MortalityJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2007
- Research Agenda for Frailty in Older Adults: Toward a Better Understanding of Physiology and Etiology: Summary from the American Geriatrics Society/National Institute on Aging Research Conference on Frailty in Older AdultsJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2006
- Long‐Term Risks of Death and Institutionalization of Elderly People in Relation to Deficit Accumulation at Age 70Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2006
- Design and baseline characteristics of the osteoporotic fractures in men (MrOS) study — A large observational study of the determinants of fracture in older menPublished by Elsevier ,2005
- Clinical Global Impression of Change in Physical Frailty: Development of a Measure Based on Clinical JudgmentJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2004
- Intentional and Unintentional Weight Loss Increase Bone Loss and Hip Fracture Risk in Older WomenJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2003
- The physical activity scale for the elderly (PASE): Development and evaluationJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993