Changes in critical care beds and occupancy in the United States 1985–2000: Differences attributable to hospital size
- 1 August 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 34 (8) , 2105-2112
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000227174.30337.3e
Abstract
To determine the relationship between hospital size and changes in the number of critical care medicine (CCM) beds, proportion of hospital beds allocated to CCM, and CCM occupancy in acute care hospitals in the United States from 1985 to 2000. A 16-yr (1985 to 2000) retrospective analysis was performed using the Hospital Cost Report Information System (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Baltimore, MD) on U.S. acute care hospitals that provided CCM. Hospitals were stratified into four groups (small, 1-100 beds; medium, 101-300 beds; large 301-500 beds; and extra large, >500 beds). Nonfederal, acute care hospitals with CCM units in the United States. None. None. Changes in the number of hospitals, non-CCM and CCM beds, the proportion of CCM to hospital beds, and their occupancy rates. Between 1985 and 2000, the number of hospitals providing CCM decreased overall (4,150 to 3,581, -13.7%). The greatest decreases were seen in large (-39%) and extra-large (-40%) hospitals. Small hospitals increased minimally (3.3%). The number of non-CCM beds decreased (820,300 to 566,900, -30.9%), most prominently in large (-44.2%) and extra-large (-46.1%) hospitals. In contrast, CCM beds increased overall (69,300 to 87,400, 26.1%), especially in small (27%) and medium (44.2%) hospitals. The proportion of total hospital beds assigned to CCM increased (71.8%), most markedly in large (93.5%) and extra-large (85.7%) hospitals. Non-CCM occupancy decreased (-6.4%), particularly in small (-7.5%) and extra-large (-5.8%) hospitals. However, regardless of hospital size, CCM occupancy changed negligibly (0.4%). At every time point studied, CCM occupancy was greater than non-CCM occupancy within each size group. As hospital size increased, occupancy rates increased. Across hospitals of all sizes, CCM bed numbers are increasing, whereas non-CCM bed numbers are decreasing. Although the CCM bed capacity is increasing at a greater percentage rate in smaller hospitals, the assignment of hospital beds to CCM remains higher in the larger hospitals. In addition, CCM bed occupancy is greater in larger institutions. These findings may help guide the future development of hospital size-based CCM benchmarking standards and guidelines.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluating and planning ICUs: methods and approaches to differentiate between need and demandHealth Policy, 2005
- Critical care medicine in the United States 1985–2000: An analysis of bed numbers, use, and costs*Critical Care Medicine, 2004
- The Critical Care Medicine Crisis: A Call for Federal ActionChest, 2004
- Patient Flow in Hospitals: Understanding and Controlling It BetterFrontiers of Health Services Management, 2004
- A Profile of Hospital AcquisitionsJournal of Healthcare Management, 2003
- Current and Projected Workforce Requirements for Care of the Critically Ill and Patients With Pulmonary DiseaseCan We Meet the Requirements of an Aging Population?JAMA, 2000
- Streamlining Critical Care: Responsibilities and Cost-Effectiveness in Intensive-Care Unit OrganizationMayo Clinic Proceedings, 1997
- Guidelines for intensive care unit designCritical Care Medicine, 1995
- Descriptive analysis of critical care units in the United StatesCritical Care Medicine, 1993
- Descriptive analysis of critical care units in the United StatesCritical Care Medicine, 1992