Clinical Experience with Implantable Devices for Control of Tachyarrhythmias

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Pacing is becoming an accepted form of treatment for reentry tachycardias. The different pacing modalities available and experience with a patient‐activated antitachycardia pacemaker are presented in this paper. This system has bidirectional communication between pacemaker and pacemaker‐activator and between pacemaker and prescription formulator (which is a sophisticated portable stimulator used for non‐invasive electrophysiological evaluation of the system). This pacemaker was implanted in 18 patients with drug‐resistant tachycardias. Six patients had ventricular tachycardia, 3 had A‐V nodal reentrant tachycardia, 4 had the concealed accessory pathway, and 5 had the WPW syndrome. In the 3 months before implantation the mean number of admissions for termination of tachycardia was 2.1 per patient‐month. During a follow‐up period of 3–26 months only 6 patients were admitted once for termination of tachycardia (0.02 admissions per patient‐month). The reasons for admission of these 6 patients were: defective pacemaker activator in 2 patients, inadequate control of tachycardia in 2 patients, inappropriate use of the device in 1, and inadequate intake of medication in 1. All these problems were solved easily. Eight pacemaker activators required reprogramming, which was done in 5 patients on an out‐patient basis. The interval scanning mode was used in 9 patients. Nine patients required more than 2 stimuli for reproducible termination. A step‐wise increase in number of stimuli was used in 5 patients.This system has proven to be a safe and effective form of treatment of drug‐resistant supraventricular and ventricular tachycardias and has resulted in marked improvement of the quality of life of these patients.