The search for a “pure” visual memory test: Pursuit of perfection?
- 1 January 1992
- journal article
- forum
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Clinical Neuropsychologist
- Vol. 6 (1) , 105-112
- https://doi.org/10.1080/13854049208404124
Abstract
Factor analyses of clinical memory tests have demonstrated that scores on tests purported to measure “visual memory” load highly on visuoperceptual and visuoconstructional factors with modest loadings on measures that define general learning and memory. This may reflect the multifactorial nature of visual-spatial memory and a multitude of methodological and test construction issues. This paper is intended to provide the clinical neuropsychologist with an explanation as to why the search for a pure measure of visual memory has been an arduous one and identifies five reasons for this apparent difficulty. Suggested directions for future nonverbal memory test development are offered.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Construct validity of material-specific memory measures following unilateral temporal lobe ablations.Psychological Assessment, 1989
- Verbal and Visual Memory Index discrepancies from the Wechsler Memory Scale—Revised: Cautions in interpretation.Psychological Assessment, 1989
- Assessing visual memory disorders.Psychological Assessment, 1989
- Wms-r patterns among patients with unilateral brain lesionsThe Clinical Neuropsychologist, 1988
- Factor structure of the wechsler memory scale-revisedThe Clinical Neuropsychologist, 1988
- Construct validity of various memory testing proceduresJournal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 1985
- Factor analysis of the WAIS and wechsler memory scale: An analysis of the construct validity of the wechsler memory scaleJournal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 1983
- Clinical memory testing: A review.Psychological Bulletin, 1977
- Nonverbal memory and hemispheric side of lesionNeuropsychologia, 1968
- MEMORY-FOR-DESIGNS TEST: REVISED GENERAL MANUALPublished by SAGE Publications ,1960