Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy: A New Minimally Invasive Procedure for Radical Management of Inguinal Nodes in Patients With Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- 1 March 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 177 (3) , 953-958
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.075
Abstract
Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy is a recently described lymphadenectomy with the same template of the open technique but performed with laparoscopic instruments under video guidance. It was developed to decrease procedure related morbidity while maintaining good oncological results. We report our initial results in a trial comparing video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy with standard inguinal lymphadenectomy. From 2003 to 2005, 10 patients with penile carcinoma who were at high risk for inguinal metastases underwent bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy. We performed standard lymphadenectomy in 1 limb and video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy on the contralateral side. Perioperative results and followup data were compared. No intraoperative complications occurred. Mean operative time was 92 and 126 minutes for open and endoscopic surgery, respectively (p=0.00002). Despite the small number of patients we noted a decrease in cutaneous complications with video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (0% vs 50%, p=0.017) and a trend toward decreased overall morbidity with this endoscopic technique (20% vs 70%, p=0.059). The mean number of retrieved and positive lymph nodes were similar for the 2 techniques. At a mean followup of 18.7 months (range 12 to 31) no signs of recurrence or disease progression were noted. In the postoperative period 9 of the 10 patients identified video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy as the preferred technique in terms of surgical morbidity. Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy is a safe and feasible technique in patients with penile carcinoma and nonpalpable nodes. These preliminary results suggest that video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy may decrease postoperative morbidity without compromising oncological control. Future studies should include the bilateral procedure, longer term followup and a greater number of patients.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Lymphatic and vascular embolizations are independent predictive variables of inguinal lymph node involvement in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penisCancer, 2005
- PATIENTS WITH PENILE CARCINOMA BENEFIT FROM IMMEDIATE RESECTION OF CLINICALLY OCCULT LYMPH NODE METASTASESJournal of Urology, 2005
- LONG-TERM FOLLOWUP OF PENILE CARCINOMA TREATED WITH PENECTOMY AND BILATERAL MODIFIED INGUINAL LYMPHADENECTOMYJournal of Urology, 2004
- COMPLICATIONS OF INGUINAL AND PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY FOR SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA OF THE PENIS: A CONTEMPORARY SERIESJournal of Urology, 2004
- Management of Clinically Nude Negative Penile Carcinoma: Improved Survival After the Introduction of Dynamic Sentinel Node BiopsyJournal of Urology, 2003
- Unreliability of modified inguinal lymphadenectomy for clinical staging of penile carcinomaCancer, 1996
- Surgical Treatment of Invasive Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Penis: Retrospective Analysis of 350 CasesJournal of Urology, 1994
- Modified Inguinal Lymphadenectomy for Carcinoma of the Penis with Preservation of Saphenous Veins: Technique and Preliminary ResultsJournal of Urology, 1988
- Penile Cancer: Relation of Extent of Nodal Metastasis to SurvivalJournal of Urology, 1987
- Contemporary Morbidity From Lymphadenectomy For Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The M.D. Anderson Cancer Center ExperiencePublished by Wolters Kluwer Health