An evaluation of oxygen therapy equipment: Experimental study of various devices on the human subject
Open Access
- 1 May 1967
- Vol. 22 (3) , 221-225
- https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.22.3.221
Abstract
Six commercially available devices were tested to determine the alveolar oxygen concentration that is achieved and the volume of rebreathing that can occur in conditions simulating clinical use. All were tested at zero oxygen flow, since failure and interruption of the oxygen supply to such devices can occur in clinical use. In patients whose cardiorespiratory reserve is exhausted, any increase in dead space will be detrimental; for such patients devices should be selected which cannot cause rebreathing under any circumstances. Three of the devices tested could cause appreciable rebreathing, i.e., Oxyaire (B.L.B. pattern), Pneumask, and the M.C. mask. Claims made for the Pneumask and the M.C. mask were not substantiated in this study. With administration by nasal catheter changes in alveolar oxygen concentrations were found to be dependent on the percentage of mouth breathing by the subject. The Ventimask produced a consistent elevation of the alveolar oxygen percentage and did not cause any increase in the dead space.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE PERFORMANCE OF NASAL CATHETERS AND A FACE MASK IN OXYGEN THERAPYThe Lancet, 1967
- MASKS AND TENT FOR PROVIDING CONTROLLED OXYGEN CONCENTRATIONSThe Lancet, 1966
- Behaviour of Apparatus for Oxygen AdministrationBMJ, 1963
- OXYGEN MASKSBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1963
- HYPOXÆMIA AFTER GENERAL ANÆSTHESIAThe Lancet, 1962
- Comparative Evaluation of Oxygen Therapy TechniquesJAMA, 1962
- A METHOD OF CONTROLLED OXYGEN ADMINISTRATION WHICH REDUCES THE RISK OF CARBON-DIOXIDE RETENTIONThe Lancet, 1960
- A New Mask for Delivering Oxygen or Other GasesBMJ, 1960
- The Polymask as a Means of Administering OxygenBMJ, 1960
- Reassessment of Value of Oxygen Masks that Permit RebreathingBMJ, 1956