Different Interference Effects in Musicians and a Control Group
- 1 January 2006
- journal article
- Published by Hogrefe Publishing Group in Experimental Psychology
- Vol. 53 (2) , 111-116
- https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.53.2.111
Abstract
In the present study musicians and normal control subjects performed an S1-S2 pitch comparison task, which included the presentation of intervening tones during the retention interval. The time for encoding and storing the pitch of S1 was varied between 200 and 1,500 ms by changing the pause between the S1 offset and the onset of the intervening tones. Although musicians outperformed the control group with longer pauses after the S1 offset, this advantage was relatively small with shorter pauses. These results suggest that the advantage of musicians in storing auditory information is not solely due to their superior encoding of information but also to improved working memory operations.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Superior pre-attentive auditory processing in musiciansNeuroReport, 1999
- Long-term working memory.Psychological Review, 1995
- Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information-processing system.Psychological Bulletin, 1988
- On short and long auditory stores.Psychological Bulletin, 1984
- The Processing of Pitch CombinationsPublished by Elsevier ,1982
- Disinhibition in pitch memoryPerception & Psychophysics, 1975
- Facilitation by repetition in recognition memory for tonal pitchMemory & Cognition, 1975
- Mapping of Interactions in the Pitch Memory StoreScience, 1972
- Effect of repetition of standard and of comparison tones on recognition memory for pitch.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972
- Tones and Numbers: Specificity of Interference in Immediate MemoryScience, 1970