Single fiber macro versus concentric trigger macro EMG: A comparison of methods
- 1 February 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Muscle & Nerve
- Vol. 15 (2) , 193-198
- https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.880150211
Abstract
The values obtained from two different macro EMG methods were compared, and found to be different. Normally, macro electromyography (EMG) is performed with a modified single fiber (SF) needle using the SF potential as a trigger; a new method recommends a modified concentric needle and triggers on the concentric EMG signal. The concentric macro EMG has a 40% to 50% smaller amplitude and area values than data obtained with a SF macro EMG needle. The different values are the result of variant spatial relationships of the respective needles to the motor unit under study, and may be due to a recruitment-dependent bias resulting from different trigger properties of the two methods. The concentric macro EMG needle can be used to estimate motor unit size, to scan the unit, and to investigate its different concentric EMG signals.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Analysis of amplitude and area of concentric needle EMG motor unit action potentialsElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1988
- MACRO-ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC STUDIES USING A NEW ELECTRODEJournal Of Clinical Neurophysiology, 1988
- Simulation of concentric needle EMG motor unit action potentialsMuscle & Nerve, 1988
- Simulation of macro EMG motor unit potentialsElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1983
- Macro EMG in healthy subjects of different ages.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1982
- Macro EMG, a new recording technique.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1980
- Electrophysiological cross section of the motor unit.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1980