Some Relationships between Behavioral and Evolutionary Archaeologies
- 1 October 1996
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Antiquity
- Vol. 61 (4) , 643-662
- https://doi.org/10.2307/282009
Abstract
Diversity in archaeology's social theories is desirable, but factioning of the discipline into antagonistic, paradigm-based camps undermines the scientific enterprise. In order to promote efforts at building bridges between different theoretical programs, this paper examines relationships between behavioral archaeology and evolutionary (selectionist) archaeology. Potential common ground is brought to light, incompatibilities are critically examined, and possible synergies are explored. It is concluded that there is no fundamental reason why these two programs cannot work in concert to achieve the goal of explaining behavioral (or evolutionary) change in human societies. Whether productive relationships can be established between other programs remains to be determined on a case-by-case basis.This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Population Aggregation in the Prehistoric American Southwest: A Selectionist ModelAmerican Antiquity, 1993
- Theory, Sampling, and Analytical Techniques in the Archaeological Study of Prehistoric CeramicsAmerican Antiquity, 1993
- Cultural Imperatives and Product Development: The Case of the Shirt-Pocket RadioTechnology and Culture, 1993
- The Role of Adaptation in Archaeological ExplanationAmerican Antiquity, 1992
- Resource Specialization, Population Growth, and Agricultural Production in the American SouthwestAmerican Antiquity, 1989
- Aspects of the application of evolutionary theory in archaeologyPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1989
- The Structure of Archaeological TheoryAmerican Antiquity, 1988
- Behavioral Archaeology: Four Strategies1American Anthropologist, 1975
- Archaeology as Behavioral Science1American Anthropologist, 1975
- The Structure of ScienceAmerican Journal of Physics, 1961