Pattern-onset visual evoked potentials in suspected multiple sclerosis.
Open Access
- 1 July 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
- Vol. 44 (7) , 608-614
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.44.7.608
Abstract
Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) were obtained by monocular stimulation using a checkerboard pattern-reversal and pattern-onset technique. In 11 normal subjects, pattern-onset VEPs were generally larger, better defined, and less ambiguous than those elicited by pattern-reversal, because of the biphasic waveform characteristically obtained with pattern-onset stimulation. In 68 of 105 patients with possible multiple sclerosis, VEPs were normal in latency by both methods, and in nine adequate comparison was not possible. The incidence of normal VEPs to pattern-reversal was similar to that found in several other studies of patients with possible multiple sclerosis. Among the remaining 28 patients in whom VEP abnormalities were found, an increased latency was detected in 75% with the pattern-reversal technique, and in 96% by pattern-onset. In these patients, VEP abnormalities were obtained by monocular stimulation of each of 46 eyes, and among these the pattern-reversal technique yielded abnormalities in 59% and the pattern-onset method in 98%. These results indicate that VEPs elicited by pattern-onset are useful in investigating patients with suspected multiple sclerosis, and the diagnostic yield may be greater than with conventional pattern-reversal techniques.This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fieldsElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1980
- Comparison of the Pattern and Diffuse-Light Visual Evoked Responses in Definite Multiple SclerosisArchives of Neurology, 1980
- Latency of luminance and contrast evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis patientsElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1978
- Visual evoked responses in multiple sclerosis: comparison of two methods for pattern reversal.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1978
- THE COMPARISON OF SMALL-SIZE RECTANGLE AND CHECKERBOARD STIMULATION FOR THE EVALUATION OF DELAYED VISUAL EVOKED RESPONSES IN PATIENTS SUSPECTED OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSISBrain, 1977
- VISUAL EVOKED RESPONSES IN THE DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS SUSPECTED OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSISBrain, 1975
- DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS BY VISUAL EVOKED POTENTIAL RECORDINGBrain, 1974
- Visual Evoked Response in Diagnosis of Multiple SclerosisBMJ, 1973
- Visually evoked cortical potentials to patterned stimuli in monkey and manElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1973
- DELAYED VISUAL EVOKED RESPONSE IN OPTIC NEURITISThe Lancet, 1972