Preoperative Lymphoscintigraphy and Dynamic Sentinel Node Biopsy for Staging Penile Cancer: Results With Pathological Correlation
- 30 June 2007
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 177 (6) , 2157-2161
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.125
Abstract
Purpose: We assessed the sensitivity of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and dynamic sentinel node biopsy for staging the inguinal region of patients with penile cancer and no palpable inguinal adenopathy. Materials and Methods: The records of 31 patients with invasive penile cancer and nonpalpable (29) or nonsuspicious (2) inguinal lymph nodes were reviewed. Preoperatively lymphoscintigraphy plus dynamic sentinel node biopsy with 99mtechnetium labeled sulfur colloid and isosulfan blue dye was performed in 21 patients and dynamic sentinel node biopsy alone with blue dye only was done in 10. All patients underwent superficial lymph node dissection regardless of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy or dynamic sentinel node biopsy findings to establish pathological nodal status. Results: Six of 32 groins that showed drainage on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy had inguinal node metastasis, as did 1 of 10 that was drainage negative. The sensitivity of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy drainage for cancer detection was 86%. Using dynamic sentinel node biopsy with blue dye plus radiotracer 5 sentinel lymph nodes were positive for cancer, although 2 false-negative results were obtained. Thus, the sensitivity of dynamic sentinel node biopsy per groin for cancer detection was 71%. Conclusions: In our experience preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and dynamic sentinel node biopsy as currently performed remain insufficient for detecting occult inguinal disease. Superficial lymph node dissection remains the gold standard for detecting inguinal microscopic metastasis in select patients.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dynamic sentinel node biopsy in clinically node-negative penile cancer versus radical inguinal lymphadenectomy: A comparative studyUrology, 2005
- HOW TO AVOID FALSE-NEGATIVE DYNAMIC SENTINEL NODE PROCEDURES IN PENILE CARCINOMAJournal of Urology, 2004
- Dynamic Sentinel Node Biopsy for Penile Cancer: Reliability of a Staging TechniqueJournal of Urology, 2002
- PROSPECTIVE VALIDATION OF THE ASSOCIATION OF LOCAL TUMOR STAGE AND GRADE AS A PREDICTIVE FACTOR FOR OCCULT LYMPH NODE MICROMETASTASIS IN PATIENTS WITH PENILE CARCINOMA AND CLINICALLY NEGATIVE INGUINAL LYMPH NODESJournal of Urology, 2001
- TUMOR STAGE, VASCULAR INVASION AND THE PERCENTAGE OF POORLY DIFFERENTIATED CANCER: INDEPENDENT PROGNOSTICATORS FOR INGUINAL LYMPH NODE METASTASIS IN PENILE SQUAMOUS CANCERJournal of Urology, 2001
- Outcomes of Initial Surveillance of Invasive Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Penis and Negative NodesJournal of Urology, 1996
- The Role of Ilioinguinal Lymphadenectomy and Significance of Histological Differentiation in Treatment of Carcinoma of the PenisJournal of Urology, 1989
- Treatment of Carcinoma of the Penis: The Case for Primary LymphadenectomyJournal of Urology, 1986
- Management of regional lymph nodes in penile carcinoma Five-year results following therapeutic groin dissectionsUrology, 1984
- Contemporary Morbidity From Lymphadenectomy For Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The M.D. Anderson Cancer Center ExperiencePublished by Wolters Kluwer Health