Hexachlorophene— Not a Cry of "Wolf"
- 1 February 1975
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Dermatology
- Vol. 111 (2) , 250-251
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.1975.01630140108014
Abstract
While talking with a group of dermatologists recently, I was surprised to learn that very few believed that hexachlorophene was a dangerous substance. Since the available data against hexachlorophene's safety seemed quite substantial to me, I pondered how this disbelief by knowledgeable and critical men had come to pass. After speaking with several of them individually, I reached the conclusion that the key to the skepticism rested on the fact that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had played such an important role in the saga. Events such as the FDA's dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) fiasco have been compounded by the current mind-boggling debacle banning the inclusion of neomycin in a widely distributed standardized patch test tray. These and other episodes have greatly injured the credibility of an agency that is constantly under the dissecting microscope of the nation's medical scientists. Perhaps understandably, dermatologists have become like the villagers in Aesop'sKeywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- The oral and dermal toxicity of hexachlorophene in ratsToxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 1973
- Cutaneous absorption of hexachlorophene in low-birth-weight infantsThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1973
- Hexachlorophene-Induced Alterations in the Metabolism of Cultured Human Lung CellsExperimental Biology and Medicine, 1973
- Hexachlorophene Effects on the Rat BrainArchives of environmental health, 1971