A strategic approach to mitigating the impacts of wild canids: proposed activities of the Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre
- 1 January 2006
- journal article
- review article
- Published by CSIRO Publishing in Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture
- Vol. 46 (7) , 753-762
- https://doi.org/10.1071/ea06009
Abstract
Wild canids (wild dogs and European red foxes) cause substantial losses to Australian livestock industries and environmental values. Both species are actively managed as pests to livestock production. Contemporaneously, the dingo proportion of the wild dog population, being considered native, is protected in areas designated for wildlife conservation. Wild dogs particularly affect sheep and goat production because of the behavioural responses of domestic sheep and goats to attack, and the flexible hunting tactics of wild dogs. Predation of calves, although less common, is now more economically important because of recent changes in commodity prices. Although sometimes affecting lambing and kidding rates, foxes cause fewer problems to livestock producers but have substantial impacts on environmental values, affecting the survival of small to medium-sized native fauna and affecting plant biodiversity by spreading weeds. Canid management in Australia relies heavily on the use of compound 1080-poisoned baits that can be applied aerially or by ground. Exclusion fencing, trapping, shooting, livestock-guarding animals and predator calling with shooting are also used. The new Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre has 40 partners representing private and public land managers, universities, and training, research and development organisations. One of the major objectives of the new IACRC is to apply a strategic approach in order to reduce the impacts of wild canids on agricultural and environmental values in Australia by 10%. In this paper, the impacts, ecology and management of wild canids in Australia are briefly reviewed and the first cooperative projects that will address IACRC objectives for improving wild dog management are outlined.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Do wild dogs exclude foxes? Evidence for competition from dietary and spatial overlapsAustral Ecology, 2005
- Improving the efficiency of wildlife monitoring by estimating detectability: a case study of foxes (Vulpes vulpes) on the Eyre Peninsula, South AustraliaWildlife Research, 2005
- Molecular techniques, wildlife management and the importance of genetic population structure and dispersal: a case study with feral pigsJournal of Applied Ecology, 2004
- Redefining introgressed protected mammals: when is a wildcat a wild cat and a dingo a wild dog?Wildlife Research, 2003
- Lamb predation and fox control in south‐eastern AustraliaJournal of Applied Ecology, 2000
- The effectiveness of a large-scale baiting campaign and an evaluation of a buffer zone strategy for fox controlWildlife Research, 2000
- The behavioural ecology of dingoes in north-western Australia. VI. Temporary extraterritorial movements and dispersalWildlife Research, 1992
- Feeding-Behavior and Diet of Dingoes in the Nullarbor Region, Western-AustraliaWildlife Research, 1990
- The Ecology of the Dingo in Northeastern New-South-Wales .4. Prey Selection by Dingoes, and Its Effect on the Major Prey Species, the Swamp Wallaby, Wallabia-Bicolor (Desmarest)Wildlife Research, 1986
- The Ecology of the Dingo in North-Eastern New South Wales I. Movements and Home RangeWildlife Research, 1985