Growth Performance for Four Breeds of Swine: Crossbred Females and Purebred and Crossbred Boars
- 1 January 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Animal Science
- Vol. 64 (1) , 99-108
- https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1987.64199x
Abstract
Purebred and two-breed cross (F1) boars were mated to F1 females to produce all possible three- and four-breed cross pigs involving the Duroc, Yorkshire, Landrace and Spotted breeds. Individual postweaning average daily gain (ADG), age at 100 kg (AGE) and probed backfat thickness at 100 kg (BF) data were collected on 3,456 pigs. A total of 213 pens with an average of 15.58 pigs per pen was evaluated for postweaning feed-to-gain ratio (F/G) and average daily feed consumption (ADF). Genotype × environment interactions, specifically breed × year-season farrowed and breed × parity (for ADG), were found to be highly significant. Certain results, however, were reasonably consistent across environments. Duroc-sired pigs grew more efficiently than other sire breed groups (3.11 vs 3.21 F/G), although there were no significant differences in ADF between sire groups. Duroc-sired pigs had less BF than other three-breed cross pigs, based upon within breed of dam comparisons, suggesting differences in composition between the more efficient Duroc-sired pigs and other breed groups. Landrace-sired pigs were fatter than other sire groups. No real differences between crossbred-sired pigs and the average of contemporary purebred-sired pigs were apparent for F/G, ADF, ADG, AGE or BF. Assuming paternal heterosis to be zero, these results suggested recombination effects to be negligible for postweaning performance traits. Apart from via direct genetic effects, mating crossbred rather than purebred boars to females of different breeding should have little or no impact on feedlot performance of offspring produced. Copyright © 1987. American Society of Animal Science . Copyright 1987 by American Society of Animal ScienceThis publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Individual Heterosis and Breed Effects for Postweaning Performance and Carcass Traits in Four Breeds of SwineJournal of Animal Science, 1987
- Sow Productivity Comparisons for four Breeds of Swine: Purebred and Crossbred LittersJournal of Animal Science, 1984
- Comparison of crossbred and purebred boars for progeny growth and carcass meritAnimal Science, 1978
- A COMPARISON OF CROSSBRED AND PUREBRED BOARS FOR SEMEN AND REPRODUCTIVE CHARACTERISTICSCanadian Journal of Animal Science, 1978
- Reproductive and Testicular Characteristics of Purebred and Crossbred Boars2Journal of Animal Science, 1977
- Evaluation of three- and four-breed cross litters and pigs sired by purebred and crossbred boarsAnimal Science, 1977
- Comparison of Performance of Crossbred Pigs Sired by Purebred and Crossbred BoarsJournal of Animal Science, 1964