What is the specificity of the response to the own first-name when presented as a novel in a passive oddball paradigm? An ERP study
- 1 April 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Brain Research
- Vol. 1447, 65-78
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2012.01.072
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 62 references indexed in Scilit:
- ELAN: A Software Package for Analysis and Visualization of MEG, EEG, and LFP SignalsComputational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2011
- Single-trial event-related potentials and the orienting reflex to monaural tonesInternational Journal of Psychophysiology, 2011
- Electrophysiological evidence for an early processing of human voicesBMC Neuroscience, 2009
- The development of passive auditory novelty processingInternational Journal of Psychophysiology, 2008
- Emotional context enhances auditory novelty processing: behavioural and electrophysiological evidenceEuropean Journal of Neuroscience, 2008
- Effects of attention and confidence on the hypothesized ERP correlates of recollection and familiarityNeuropsychologia, 2004
- Event‐related potentials associated with sound discrimination versus novelty detection in childrenPsychophysiology, 2003
- Working memory controls involuntary attention switching: evidence from an auditory distraction paradigmEuropean Journal of Neuroscience, 2003
- Neural Mechanisms of Involuntary Attention to Acoustic Novelty and ChangeJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1998
- P300 in response to the subject's own nameElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 1995