No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations
Top Cited Papers
- 1 September 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The Lancet
- Vol. 374 (9695) , 1105-1112
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(09)61116-8
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Challenges in evaluating surgical innovationThe Lancet, 2009
- Developing appropriate methodology for the study of surgical techniquesJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2009
- Step-wedge cluster-randomised community-based trials: An application to the study of the impact of community health insuranceHealth Research Policy and Systems, 2008
- Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidanceBMJ, 2008
- A Randomized Trial of Arthroscopic Surgery for Osteoarthritis of the KneeNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Orthopaedic Surgeons Prefer to Participate in Expertise-based Randomized TrialsClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2008
- A Review of Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) for Intra-abdominal SurgeryAnnals of Surgery, 2008
- Effects of Bariatric Surgery on Mortality in Swedish Obese SubjectsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- When are randomised trials unnecessary? Picking signal from noiseBMJ, 2007
- Classification of Surgical ComplicationsAnnals of Surgery, 2004