Relationship of Processes and Structures of Care in General Surgery to Postoperative Outcomes: A Descriptive Analysis
- 30 June 2007
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of the American College of Surgeons
- Vol. 204 (6) , 1157-1165
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.019
Abstract
Background The systematic collection of quantitative data on structures and processes from surgical services participating in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) has not been a focus to date. Efficient collection of useful measures of structures and processes may improve understanding of surgical outcomes and strategies for improving the quality of surgical care, as NSQIP continues to expand. The purpose of this article was to describe results of a quantitative survey designed to measure surgical care structures and processes within NSQIP sites. Study Design A cross-sectional survey was mailed to 123 Department of Veteran Affairs (VA) and 14 private sector sites participating in the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)-funded Patient Safety in Surgery (PSS) Study. The survey included questions about organizational structures and processes of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative general surgical care services. For this study, we included only data from 90 VA sites that returned a survey (73% response rate). We used descriptive statistics and examined the bivariate association of structures and processes items or scales with risk-adjusted observed-to-expected (O/E) ratios of surgical morbidity and mortality. Results Examination of frequency or means and standard deviations of items and scales revealed substantial variation in the structures and processes of surgical care services in participating VA sites, with correlation analyses demonstrating that, of 35 process and structure variables, there was a statistically significant relationship with the hospital's observed-to-expected ratio for 14 variables for morbidity, but only 4 variables for mortality. Conclusions This descriptive analysis provides support for the potential importance of measuring organizational structures and processes of care in addition to risk-adjusted morbidity and mortality.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Relationship of Processes and Structures of Care in General Surgery to Postoperative Outcomes: A Hierarchical AnalysisJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2007
- Relationship of Processes and Structures of Care in General Surgery to Postoperative Outcomes: A Qualitative AnalysisJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2007
- What do we know about how to do audit and feedback? Pitfalls in applying evidence from a systematic reviewBMC Health Services Research, 2005
- Nurse Staffing Models as Predictors of Patient OutcomesMedical Care, 2003
- Physician Staffing Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill PatientsJAMA, 2002
- The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in Non-Veterans Administration HospitalsAnnals of Surgery, 2002
- Nurse-Staffing Levels and the Quality of Care in HospitalsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- The Comparative Assessment and Improvement of Quality of Surgical Care in the Department of Veterans AffairsArchives of Surgery, 2002
- The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIPAnnals of Surgery, 1998
- A regional intervention to improve the hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study GroupJAMA, 1996