Ten Recommendations for Closing the Credibility Gap in Reporting Industry-Sponsored Clinical Research: A Joint Journal and Pharmaceutical Industry Perspective
Open Access
- 31 May 2012
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Mayo Clinic Proceedings
- Vol. 87 (5) , 424-429
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.02.009
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- The potential for bias in reporting of industry‐sponsored clinical trialsPharmaceutical Statistics, 2011
- Missing clinical trial dataBMJ, 2011
- Publication of NIH funded trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: cross sectional analysisBMJ, 2011
- Authors' Submission Toolkit: A practical guide to getting your research publishedCurrent Medical Research and Opinion, 2010
- Bidirectional Conflicts of Interest Involving Industry and Medical Journals: Who Will Champion Integrity?Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 2009
- Online Disclosure of Physician–Industry RelationshipsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Bias, Spin, and Misreporting: Time for Full Access to Trial Protocols and ResultsPLoS Medicine, 2008
- Industry-Sponsored Clinical ResearchJAMA, 2008
- International Society for Medical Publication Professionals (ISMPP)position statement: the role of the professional medical writerCurrent Medical Research and Opinion, 2007
- Reporting Conflicts of Interest, Financial Aspects of Research, and Role of Sponsors in Funded StudiesJAMA, 2005