Reappraisal of the Peruvian and Brazilian lower titer tetravalent rhesus-human reassortant rotavirus vaccine efficacy trials: analysis by severity of diarrhea
- 1 November 1999
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
- Vol. 18 (11) , 1001-1006
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00006454-199911000-00013
Abstract
With the purpose of better understanding the efficacy of the lower titer [4 × 104 plaque-forming units (pfu)] tetravalent rhesus-human reassortant rotavirus vaccine (RRV-TV) against diarrheal episodes of different severities, the Peruvian and Brazilian efficacy data were reanalyzed with a 20-point scoring system. Mild, moderate/severe and very severe rotavirus diarrhea were scored as 0 to 8, 9 to 14 and >14, respectively. In the Peruvian study one dose of vaccine yielded 64% (P = 0.04) protection against pure cases of rotavirus disease (i.e. those in which no other enteropathogen was found) with clinical scores ranging from 9 to 14. Protective efficacy against very severe rotavirus gastroenteritis could not be assessed because of the small number of cases. In Brazil there was a trend in preventing "all" and "pure" cases of rotavirus diarrhea scored 9 to 14 (44%, P = 0.06, and 45%, P = 0.08, respectively) and the vaccine was 75% (P = 0.02) protective against pure rotavirus diarrhea scored >14. No protection was observed for mild rotavirus diarrhea (scores 5 Our reanalysis provides evidence that, at least against moderate/severe rotavirus gastroenteritis, RRV-TV, 4 × 104 pfu/dose is potentially as efficacious as RRV-TV, 4 × 105 pfu/dose, even in settings with very high rotavirus disease burden. The reanalysis of the Peruvian data suggests that one and three vaccine doses may yield similar efficacy rates. It is also suggested that vaccine efficacy against most severe episodes in Peru and Brazil was not evident because of the trial design used in those studies (i.e. prospective, active home surveillance rather than a catchment trial), resulting in too few cases of severe disease even in the placebo group. To confirm these findings, future trials with this vaccine are necessary in developing countries with high diarrhea morbidity rates. These trials should use catchment designs and focus on the evaluation of the efficacy of one or three doses of RRV-TV against moderate to severe/very severe rotavirus diarrhea.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Safety, Immunogenicity, and Protective Efficacy of One and Three Doses of the Tetravalent Rhesus Rotavirus Vaccine in Infants in Lima, PeruThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1996
- Evaluation of rhesus rotavirus monovalent and tetravalent reassortant vaccines in US children. US Rotavirus Vaccine Efficacy GroupPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1995
- Rotavirus vaccines: success by reassortment?Science, 1994
- Vaccination of Thai infants with rhesus-human reassortant tetravalent oral rotavirus vaccineThe Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 1994
- Evaluation of the antigenicity and reactogenicity of varying formulations of the rhesus rotavirus‐based quadrivalent and the M37 rotavirus vaccine candidatesJournal of Medical Virology, 1994
- Comparison of reactogenicity and antigenicity of M37 rotavirus vaccine and rhesus-rotavirus-based quadrivalent vaccineThe Lancet, 1990
- Prospective study of diarrheal diseases in Venezuelan children to evaluate the efficacy of rhesus rotavirus vaccineJournal of Medical Virology, 1990
- Rotavirus Disease in Finnish Children: Use of Numerical Scores for Clinical Severity of Diarrhoeal EpisodesScandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1990
- Longitudinal study of rotavirus infections among children from Belém, BrazilEpidemiology and Infection, 1989
- PROTECTION AGAINST SEVERE ROTAVIRUS DIARRHOEA BY RHESUS ROTAVIRUS VACCINE IN VENEZUELAN INFANTSThe Lancet, 1987