Subcutaneously Versus Subfascially Administered Lidocaine in Pain Treatment After Inguinal Herniotomy
- 1 August 1994
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Anesthesia & Analgesia
- Vol. 79 (2) , 324???327-7
- https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199408000-00022
Abstract
We conducted a randomized, prospective, double-blind trial to compare the efficacy of subfascial (SF) versus subcutaneous (SC) lidocaine (10 mL 1%) given in the wound postoperatively through a catheter placed in the respective layer intraoperatively. The initial pain scores were similar in the two groups before injection of lidocaine. In the SC group, there was a reduction in pain scores during rest from 4 to 3 (P > 0.05), during cough from 6 to 5 (P > 0.05), and during mobilization from 7 to 5.5 (P > 0.05) at 15 min. In the SF group, the reductions in pain scores were from 4 to 2 (P < 0.05), from 6 to 3 (P < 0.05), and from 7 to 3 (P < 0.05), respectively. Supplemental analgesics after the lidocaine administration were needed earlier in the SC group than in the SF group (P < 0.01). We conclude that postoperative pain treatment with local lidocaine application after herniotomy has a better effect when applied in the SF, rather than the SC, layer.Keywords
This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: