Urban history and social class: two paradigms
- 1 April 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Urban History
- Vol. 20 (1) , 61-77
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0963926800010002
Abstract
For much of the 1970s and early 1980s historians using an urban focus to analyse social class, social stratification and political conflict led the field. The work of John Foster, Geoffrey Crossick, Robert Gray, Patrick Joyce and others helped set an agenda to which all social historians responded. Today research of a similar type can easily be found, but even whilst this shows a high degree of conceptual sophistication and empirical rigour it seems less central to the discipline and to the broad concerns of social history than was the case even a decade ago. In this speculative paper I reflect on some of the reasons for this and consider the contemporary prospects for studies of the relationship between urban history and social class.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Class Struggle and the Industrial RevolutionPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2003
- Businessmen, the Urban Middle Classes, and the 'Dominance' of Manufacturers in Nineteenth-Century BritainThe Economic History Review, 1991
- Political Change and the Labour Party 1900–1918Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1990
- The spatial configuration of class solidarity in London's West End 1792–1939Urban History, 1990
- State, Private Life and Political ChangePublished by Springer Nature ,1990
- “GENTLEMANLY CAPITALISM” AND BRITISH INDUSTRY 1820–1914Past & Present, 1989
- Understanding political alignments in contemporary Britain: do localities matter?Political Geography Quarterly, 1987
- Women and Class Analysis: In Defence of the Conventional ViewSociology, 1983
- Class Consciousness in Oldham and other North-West Industrial Towns 1830–1850The Historical Journal, 1978
- Labour Migration and Age- CompositionSociological Review, 1939