NEW EMBO MEMBER'S REVIEW: The inner nuclear membrane: simple, or very complex?
Open Access
- 15 June 2001
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in The EMBO Journal
- Vol. 20 (12) , 2989-2994
- https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/20.12.2989
Abstract
‘All these years that I'm painfully counting The few, the many, the unknown Wandering alone Shining my light in front of a magical mirror’ ( The Guard and the King , Socratis Malamas) How is the ‘identity’ of the nuclear envelope established and what does this structure do, apart from separating the cytoplasm from the nucleoplasm? Touching on these questions, I discuss here the molecular features and the nearest‐neighbour relationships of five integral proteins that represent major components of the inner nuclear membrane. As it turns out, these proteins are organized in large, multi‐subunit complexes, which anchor at the nuclear lamina and ‘trap’ in situ a variety of regulatory factors. It is these factors that impart domain specificity and give the nuclear envelope its unique characteristics. ### Substructure of the nuclear envelope and relationship with the endoplasmic reticulum The nuclear envelope is a modular structure, consisting of discrete, flattened cisternae. These cisternae comprise two different ‘unit membranes’: the outer nuclear membrane, which faces the cytoplasm and is continuous with the rough endoplasmic reticulum (ER); and the inner nuclear membrane, which faces the nucleoplasm and is covered by the nuclear lamina. The inner and outer membranes are separated by a narrow lumen (perinuclear space) and join periodically at the pore membrane. This is a highly specialized membrane domain, exposed on both sides of the cytoplasm–nucleoplasm interface and accommodating the nuclear pore complex. The physico‐chemical properties of the nuclear membranes have not been directly determined. Nevertheless, several studies have been made using intact nuclei and nuclei lacking large pieces of the outer nuclear membrane (e.g. Schindler et al ., 1985). From these experiments it has been inferred that the inner and outer membranes do not differ significantly, having essentially the same phospholipid mobility and lipid composition. A structural relatedness between the nuclear envelope and the ER membrane has been suggested by recent observations, showing that nuclear …Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Review: Lamina-Associated Polypeptide 2 Isoforms and Related Proteins in Cell Cycle-Dependent Nuclear Structure DynamicsJournal of Structural Biology, 2000
- MAN1, an Inner Nuclear Membrane Protein That Shares the LEM Domain with Lamina-associated Polypeptide 2 and EmerinJournal of Biological Chemistry, 2000
- Direct Interaction between Emerin and Lamin ABiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2000
- SRPK1 and LBR Protein Kinases Show Identical Substrate SpecificitiesBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1999
- Rules to Remodel By: What Drives Nuclear Envelope Disassembly and Reassembly during Mitosis?Critical Reviews™ in Eukaryotic Gene Expression, 1999
- Targeting of membranes to sea urchin sperm chromatin is mediated by a lamin B receptor-like integral membrane protein.The Journal of cell biology, 1996
- Characterization of p18, a Component of the Lamin B Receptor Complex and a New Integral Membrane Protein of the Avian Erythrocyte Nuclear EnvelopePublished by Elsevier ,1996
- The lamin B receptor‐associated protein p34 shares sequence homology and antigenic determinants with the splicing factor 2‐associated protein p32FEBS Letters, 1994
- Lateral diffusion in nuclear membranes.The Journal of cell biology, 1985
- Mitosis in rat thyroid epithelial cells in vivoJournal of Ultrastructure Research, 1979