The Endoscopic Diagnosis of Gastric Ulcer
- 1 January 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
- Vol. 20 (5) , 554-558
- https://doi.org/10.3109/00365528509089695
Abstract
A critical evaluation of the endoscopic diagnosis of gastric ulcer was carried out. In a randomized design it was elucidated whether endoscopists are biased by knowledge of the radiological diagnosis when interpreting their endoscopic findings. In addition, the interobserver variation of the endoscopic diagnosis was determined. A total of 156 patients had a barium-meal examination and were subsequently endoscoped by the same two physicians in one session. Before the endoscopy, the patients were randomized in two groups. In 74 patients the physicians knew the radiologic result at the endoscopy; in 82 they did not. One endoscopist was significantly influenced by his knowledge of the radiological diagnosis. The interobserver variation, expressed as the kappa coefficient, was 0.54 and 0.60, respectively, in the two groups. The disagreement especially concerned small ulcers.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interobserver Variation in Assessment of Respiratory SignsActa Medica Scandinavica, 1984
- Observer variation in assessment of liver biopsies including analysis by kappa statisticsGastroenterology, 1980
- A Comparison of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and RadiographyJournal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 1980
- How reliable is determination of ulcer size by endoscopy?BMJ, 1979
- Interpretation of plantar reflexes: biasing effect of other signs and symptoms.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1977
- A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal ScalesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1960
- Disagreement Between Observers in an Epidemiological Study of Respiratory DiseaseBMJ, 1955