Social policy and social change – explanations of the development of social policy
- 1 July 1973
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Social Policy
- Vol. 2 (3) , 209-224
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279400003019
Abstract
The resources of sociology do not appear to have been extensively or systematically utilized in the study of social policy and administration. One source of evidence for this statement is the absence of explicit references to sociological theories in some of the most well known general texts on British social policy and administration. Pinker's recent analysis of social theory and social policy also lends support to the view that there has been, and still remains, something of a division between sociologists and students of social policy and administration. He concludes that the ‘founding fathers’ of sociology (Marx, Durkheim, Weber and Spencer) had a tendency to be ‘not greatly interested…(in)…remedies for social problems’, and makes the general observation that ‘sociologists have been oddly diffident about the subject-matter of social administration’, possibly because of the latter's atheoretical nature.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Politics Of MedicarePublished by Taylor & Francis ,2017
- New Directions in Sociological Theory.Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 1975
- The Concept of PovertyBritish Journal of Sociology, 1971
- The Coming Crisis in Western SociologySocial Forces, 1971
- Sociology and Social Work—An IntroductionPublished by Elsevier ,1970
- The Social Construction of RealityThe Modern Language Journal, 1967
- An Introduction to the Study of Social AdministrationBritish Journal of Sociology, 1965
- The English Health Service: Its Origins, Structure, and Achievements.Political Science Quarterly, 1959
- The Man on the Assembly LineSouthern Economic Journal, 1953
- The Rules of Sociological Method.American Sociological Review, 1938