The People's Image of Conflict Resolution
- 1 March 1989
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Conflict Resolution
- Vol. 33 (1) , 37-66
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002789033001002
Abstract
This article presents a comparison of political preferences for solutions to the Israeli-Arab conflict of three samples of respondents synchronously interviewed: Israeli Jews, Israeli Arabs, and West Bank Arabs. The results indicate no solution is simultaneously endorsed at the grass roots by a plurality of Israeli Jews on the one hand, and Israeli Arabs or West Bank Arabs on the other. Nonetheless, both Jews and Arabs distinguish between ideal (coveted) solutions, and reality-bound ones they could live with and would accept. Within nationalities, attitudes vary to a limited extent according to social characteristics such as education and religiosity. Additionally, among Israeli Arabs attitudes are significantly affected by locality of residence, especially among rural dwellers, which is a reminder of the enduring relevance of the traditional-modern dimension of analysis for this population.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Social Distance in the Israeli-Arab ConflictComparative Political Studies, 1986
- Statistical OpticsPhysics Bulletin, 1986
- Some Cognitive Dimensions of the Israeli-Arab ConflictJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1985
- The Class Situation of the Arab National Minority in IsraelComparative Studies in Society and History, 1978
- Becoming ModernPublished by Harvard University Press ,1974
- Change, Barriers to Change, and Contradictions in the Arab Village Family1American Anthropologist, 1968