Abstract
Compressional waves are sensitive to the type of pore fluid within rocks, but shear waves are only slightly affected by changes in fluid type. This suggests that a comparison of compressional‐ and shear‐wave seismic data recorded over a prospect may allow an interpreter to discriminate between gas‐related anomalies and those related to lithology. This case study documents that where a compressional‐wave “bright spot” or other direct hydrocarbon indicator is present, such a comparison can be used to verify the presence of gas. In practice, the technique can only be used for a qualitative evaluation. However, future improvement of shear‐wave data quality may enable the use of more quantitative methods as well.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: