Response Bias and the Need for Extensive Mail Questionnaire Follow-ups Among Selected Recreation Samples
- 1 July 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Leisure Research
- Vol. 14 (3) , 207-216
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1982.11969517
Abstract
The hypothesis advanced by Wellman et al. (1980), that extensive follow-up efforts to achieve high mail questionnaire response rates may not be necessary in certain types of recreation studies, was examined. Both a non-response and a date-of-return analysis for data from innertube floaters of two Southern Appalachian streams showed very few significant differences. The findings lend support to research that suggests survey response rates typically considered unacceptable in recreation survey research may be adequate at representing selected recreation samples.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mailed Questionnaire Surveys and the Reluctant Respondent: An Empirical Examination of Differences Between Early and Late RespondentsJournal of Leisure Research, 1980
- Factors Affecting Response Rates to Mailed Questionnaires: A Quantitative Analysis of the Published LiteratureAmerican Sociological Review, 1978
- Clues to Reasons for Nonresponse, and its Effect upon Variable EstimatesJournal of Leisure Research, 1978
- Resolving Research Controversy Through Empirical CumulationSociological Methods & Research, 1974
- The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1962