EXPERIENCE WITH THE PIGGYBACK TECHNIQUE WITHOUT CAVAL OCCLUSION IN ADULT ORTHOTOPIC LIVER TRANSPLANTATION
- 1 January 1998
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Transplantation
- Vol. 65 (1) , 77-82
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-199801150-00015
Abstract
To assess the feasibility and outcome of a piggyback technique without caval occlusion or veno-venous bypass (VB), we retrospectively reviewed 131 consecutive adult orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) performed in 129 patients between May 1993 and February 1995. Six were second transplants, and six were combined liver-kidney transplants. The piggyback technique was attempted in all cases. We were able to perform the piggyback technique in 98 OLTs (75%). The remaining 33 OLTs (25%) were converted to the standard technique; of these, 20 (15%) required VB. The reasons for conversion to the standard technique were: anatomical (22 transplants), severe portal hypertension requiring VB (8 transplants), tumor (1 transplant), and other reasons (2 transplants). Six retransplantations were performed (four piggyback, two standard). There was no significant difference in age, United Network for Organ Sharing status, Child's classification, and diagnosis between the patients in whom piggyback was possible or not. The actuarial patient and graft survival at 1 year were similar between the piggyback group and the group of patients converted to standard technique (87/85% vs. 86/86%, respectively). No death was related to either technique. With piggyback, the average operative time was 8.6±1.9 hr, median amount of blood transfused intraoperatively was 2 U (33% did not require transfusion), and median intensive care unit and hospital stays were 3 and 11 days, respectively. With the piggyback technique, the mean preoperative and maximum postoperative serum creatinine levels were 1.4±1.0 and 1.8±1.5 mg/dl. The piggyback technique without caval occlusion is possible in the majority of patients. It is safe and has reduced the use of VB to 15% of our adult OLTs. The piggyback technique avoids retrocaval dissection, facilitates retransplantation, and is associated with a short anhepatic phase, low blood product usage, and short intensive care unit stay.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Piggy-back versus conventional technique in liver transplantation: report of a randomized trialTransplant International, 1997
- INFLUENCE OF SPONTANEOUS PORTOSYSTEMIC COLLATERAL PATHWAYS ON PORTAL HEMODYNAMICS IN LIVING-RELATED LIVER TRANSPLANTATION IN CHILDRENTransplantation, 1995
- Temporary portocaval anastomosis with preservation of caval flow during orthotopic liver transplantationThe American Journal of Surgery, 1995
- ORTHOTOPIC LIVER TRANSPLANTATION WITH PRESERVATION OF THE CAVAL AND PORTAL FLOWS Technique and Results in 62 CasesTransplantation, 1994
- Could the Piggyback Operation in Liver Transplantation Be Routinely Used?Archives of Surgery, 1994
- PROTEASE ACTIVITIES, AS WELL AS PLASMINOGEN ACTIVATORS, CONTRIBUTE TO THE “LYTIC” STATE DURING ORTHOTOPIC LIVER TRANSPLANTATIONTransplantation, 1993
- Orthotopic Liver Transplantation with Preservation of the Inferior Vena CavaAnnals of Surgery, 1989
- Air Embolism Associated with Veno-venous Bypass during Orthotopic Liver TransplantationAnesthesiology, 1987
- LIVER TRANSPLANTATION WITHOUT VENOUS BYPASSTransplantation, 1987
- Venous Bypass in Clinical Liver TransplantationAnnals of Surgery, 1984