Measuring meals: structure of prandial food and water intake of rats
- 1 June 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physiological Society in American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
- Vol. 288 (6) , R1450-R1467
- https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00175.2004
Abstract
Attempts to understand ingestion have sought to understand the control of meals. The present study evaluated a meal definition that included prandial drinking (drinking-explicit meals). The spontaneous nocturnal intake of male Wistar rats was studied. The meal breakpoint was defined as the interval between feeding or drinking events providing the most stable estimate of meal structure. Alternative breakpoints derived from prevailing methodology, log-survivorship, or frequency histogram analysis of interfeeding intervals without respect to drinking were compared (drinking-naive meals). Threshold interfeeding intervals that accounted for drinking indirectly were evaluated as surrogate breakpoints (drinking-implicit meals). Definitions were compared by determining which criterion better conformed to predictions of satiety. Microstructural differences resulting from the definitions were also studied. Under the drinking-explicit definition, rats averaged nine or ten 13-min meals/night, during which they consumed food and water equally in duration (5–6 min) and quantity (2.3 g). Individual differences were observed in microstructure measures. Meals defined by drinking-informed, but not drinking-naive, methods were followed by the behavioral satiety sequence and by an initially low likelihood of resuming feeding that monotonically increased with time. The drinking-explicit definition uniquely revealed preprandial and postprandial correlations of similar magnitude. Under drinking-informed definitions, food restriction increased meal size, whereas drinking-naive definitions increased meal frequency. Drinking-implicit definitions provided workable approximations of meal frequency and size but inferior estimates of feeding duration, eating rate, and the preprandial correlation. Thus log-survivorship analysis is not appropriate for identifying meal breakpoints, and the consideration of drinking in meal definitions can provide a better estimate of meal structure.Keywords
This publication has 62 references indexed in Scilit:
- The use of Mixed Distribution Models to Determine Bout Criteria for Analysis of Animal BehaviourJournal of Theoretical Biology, 2001
- The way in which the data are combined affects the interpretation of short-term feeding behaviorPhysiology & Behavior, 2000
- Satiety Splits Feeding Behaviour into BoutsJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1998
- Renal nerve transection inhibits drinking elicited by eating and by intragastric osmotic loads in ratsPhysiology & Behavior, 1995
- Pregastric food-contingent stimulation elicits drinking in the absence of systemic dehydration in the ratPhysiology & Behavior, 1990
- Meal-interval correlations: What can they tell us?Physiology & Behavior, 1981
- Fitting Segmented Curves Whose Join Points Have to Be EstimatedJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1966
- The Scree Test For The Number Of FactorsMultivariate Behavioral Research, 1966
- The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor AnalysisEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1960
- Ecological Correlations and the Behavior of IndividualsAmerican Sociological Review, 1950