Randomized Cross-Over Evaluation of Body-Surface Area–Based Dosing Versus Flat-Fixed Dosing of Paclitaxel
- 15 January 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 21 (2) , 197-202
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2003.01.058
Abstract
Purpose: Despite dose calculation using body-surface area (BSA), pharmacokinetics of most anticancer drugs show wide interindividual variability. In this study, we evaluated the role of BSA in paclitaxel disposition. Patients and Methods: Paclitaxel pharmacokinetics were prospectively studied in 12 patients that were treated in a randomized cross-over design with paclitaxel (3-hour infusion at a 3-week interval) at 175 mg/m2 in cycle 1 (A) and a flat-fixed dose of 300 mg in cycle 2 (B), or vice versa. Blood samples were collected up to 24 hours after dosing and analyzed for total and unbound paclitaxel. Results: The area under the curves (AUC) of unbound paclitaxel were similar in both dosing groups, with mean values ± SD (A v B) of 1.34 ± 0.158 versus 1.30 ± 0.329 μM•h, indicating that BSA-based dosing reduced the coefficient of variation by 53.3%. Unbound and total paclitaxel clearance was also significantly related to various body-size measures, including BSA (R ≥ 0.617; P ≤ .033), weight (R ≥ 0.621; P ≤ .031), and lean-body mass (r ≥ 0.630; P ≤ .028). We hypothesize that this is caused by the association of paclitaxel in the circulation with Cremophor EL, the distribution of which is linked to total blood volume, and thus to BSA. Conclusion: This study indicates that paclitaxel disposition is significantly related to BSA. This provides a pharmacokinetic rationale for BSA-based dosing of this drug.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pharmacokinetics of ecteinascidin 743 administered as a 24-h continuous intravenous infusion to adult patients with soft tissue sarcomas: associations with clinical characteristics, pathophysiological variables and toxicityCancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2002
- Dosing strategies for anticancer drugs: the good, the bad and body-surface areaEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 2002
- A population analysis of the pharmacokinetics of Cremophor EL using nonlinear mixed-effect modellingCancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2002
- Comparative Pharmacokinetics of Unbound Paclitaxel During 1- and 3-Hour InfusionsJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2002
- Pharmacokinetic modeling of paclitaxel encapsulation in Cremophor EL micellesCancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2001
- ESTIMATING SAMPLE SIZES FOR CONTINUOUS, BINARY, AND ORDINAL OUTCOMES IN PAIRED COMPARISONS: PRACTICAL HINTSJournal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 1999
- Quantitation of Cremophor EL in Human Plasma Samples Using a Colorimetric Dye-Binding MicroassayAnalytical Biochemistry, 1998
- Limited oral bioavailability and active epithelial excretion of paclitaxel (Taxol) caused by P-glycoprotein in the intestineProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1997
- Normalisation of anti-cancer drug dosage using body weight and surface area: is it worthwhile?Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 1993
- Is Dose Normalization to Weight or Body Surface Area Useful in Adults?JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1990