Changing Patterns in the Management of Splenic Trauma
- 1 May 1998
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 227 (5) , 708-719
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199805000-00011
Abstract
The recognition that splenectomy renders patients susceptible to lifelong risks of septic complications has led to routine attempts at splenic conservation after trauma. In 1990, the authors reported that over an 11-year study period involving 193 patients, splenorrhaphy was the most common splenic salvage method (66% overall) noted, with nonoperative management employed in only 13% of blunt splenic injuries. This report describes changing patterns of therapy in 190 consecutive patients with splenic injuries seen during a subsequent 6-year period (1990 to 1996). An algorithmic approach for patient management and pitfalls to be avoided to ensure safe nonoperative management are detailed. Nonoperative management criteria included hemodynamic stability and computed tomographic examination without shattered spleen or other injuries requiring celiotomy. Of 190 consecutive patients, 102 (54%) were managed nonoperatively: 96 (65%) of 147 patients with blunt splenic injuries, which included 15 patients with intrinsic splenic pathology, and 6 hemodynamically stable patients with isolated stab wounds (24% of all splenic stab wounds). Fifty-six patients underwent splenectomy (29%) and 32 splenorrhaphy (17%). The mean transfusion requirement was 6 units for splenectomy survivors and 0.8 units for nonoperative therapy (85% received no transfusions). Fifteen of the 16 major infectious complications that occurred followed splenectomy. Two patients failed nonoperative therapy (2%) and underwent splenectomy, and one patient required splenectomy after partial splenic resection. There no missed enteric injuries in patients managed nonoperatively. The overall mortality rate was 5.2%, with no deaths following nonoperative management. Nonoperative management of blunt splenic injuries has replaced splenorrhaphy as the most common method of splenic conservation. The criteria have been extended to include patients previously excluded from this form of therapy. As a result, 65% of all blunt splenic injuries and select stab wounds can be managed with minimal transfusions, morbidity, or mortality, with a success rate of 98%. Splenectomy, when necessary, continues to be associated with excessive transfusion and an inordinately high postoperative sepsis rate.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Management of blunt splenic trauma: Significant differences between adults and childrenSurgery, 1997
- SplenorrhaphyAnnals of Surgery, 1990
- SPLENECTOMY FOR HEMATOLOGICAL DISEASES1990
- Nonoperative Management of Adult Blunt Splenic TraumaAnnals of Surgery, 1989
- Nonoperative Management of Blunt Splenic TraumaPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1989
- Selective Nonoperative Management of Blunt Splenic Trauma in AdultsArchives of Surgery, 1989
- Wound Healing of the Injured Spleen With and Without SplenorrhaphyPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1987
- Splenic trauma and overwhelming postsplenectomy infectionBritish Journal of Surgery, 1987
- Early postoperative course following elective splenectomy in haematological diseases: A high complication rate in patients with myeloproliferative disordersBritish Journal of Surgery, 1986
- Evolving Concepts in Splenic Surgery: Splenorrhaphy versus Splenectomy and Postsplenectomy Drainage: Experience in 105 PatientsAnnals of Surgery, 1981