The Small Firms Myth
- 1 April 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in California Management Review
- Vol. 36 (3) , 142-158
- https://doi.org/10.2307/41165759
Abstract
It is widely believed small firms have replaced large firms as the primary source of technological innovation, international competitiveness, and job creation. Yet there is little evidence to support these beliefs. In fact, the economic importance of large firms to both the national and global economy has not diminished. While their structure has changed, their adaptability has enabled them to continue to play a central role in wealth creation in the advanced industrial economies.This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Outsourcing and the Search for `Flexibility'Work, Employment & Society, 1993
- Keiretsu Networks in the Japanese Economy: A Dyad Analysis of Intercorporate TiesAmerican Sociological Review, 1992
- Gross Job Creation, Gross Job Destruction, and Employment ReallocationThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1992
- Organizational Mortality: The Liabilities of Newness and AdolescenceAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1990
- The subcontracting behavior of single vs. multiplant enterprises in US manufacturing: Implications for economic developmentWorld Development, 1990
- The Growth and Failure of U. S. Manufacturing PlantsThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1989
- Chapter 18 Empirical studies of innovation and market structurePublished by Elsevier ,1989
- Flexibility in the US Service Economy and the Emerging Spatial Division of LabourTransactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 1989
- Patterns of Firm Entry and Exit in U.S. Manufacturing IndustriesThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1988
- Innovation, Market Structure, and Firm SizeThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1987