Parental rights, child welfare, and public health: the case of PKU screening.
- 1 December 1982
- journal article
- Published by American Public Health Association in American Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 72 (12) , 1396-1400
- https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.72.12.1396
Abstract
The right of parents to refuse consent for phenylketonuria (PKU) screening is discussed in terms of moral justifications. The authors take the position that the primary function of a parental consent requirement is to protect children's welfare. In the case of PKU screening, the intervention poses minimal risk of harm while refusal of screening poses a significant risk to the child. Therefore, the principle of preventing harm overrides the parental right to refuse PKU screening.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Who Speaks for the Child: The Problems of Proxy ConsentMichigan Law Review, 1983
- A survey to evaluate parental consent as public policy for neonatal screening.American Journal of Public Health, 1982
- Medical Care for the Child at Risk: On State Supervention of Parental AutonomyThe Yale Law Journal, 1977
- Allocation of Child Medical Care Decision-Making Authority: A Suggested Interest AnalysisVirginia Law Review, 1976