Model for the examination of evolutionary trends in tooth development
- 1 February 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in American Journal of Physical Anthropology
- Vol. 102 (2) , 283-294
- https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1096-8644(199702)102:2<283::aid-ajpa9>3.0.co;2-z
Abstract
Through the use of serial computerized tomography (C-t) scans, two distinct developmental stages can be identified in mature teeth. C-t scans thus provide a non-destructive method for assessing growth within individual teeth, as well as for comparison of the development of modern and fossil teeth. The second deciduous molar (DM2) and first permanent molar (M1) resemble one another morphologically, despite differences in size and developmental rates. Thus, they provide an excellent model for studying variation in growth within an individual. To test the C-t method, we first examined a recent archaeological sample and then examined teeth from Skhul I. Serial C-t scans were used to compare two distinct developmental stages represented by the dentine-enamel junction (DEJ) and outer enamel surface (OES), respectively, in mandibular DM2 and M1 of 31 archaeological specimens. The difference in form and size between these two surfaces in and between teeth was calculated from intercusp distances measured at the DEJ and OES using the form distance matrix. Intercusp distances at the DEJ and OES of these teeth were then compared to their counterparts in the DM2 and M1 of Skhul I, taken here as representative of early anatomically modern Homo sapiens sapiens. Form differences between paired DM2 and M1 at the DEJ were smaller than those at the OES, supporting the hypothesis that differences between the two teeth increase throughout development. The increase in intercusp distances from the DEJ to OES was found to reflect the angulation of cusps relative to one another, rather than enamel thickness. Form differences between the Skhul DM2 and M1 were smaller than those observed in the recent series, and the recent M1 differed more than the DM2 from its fossil counterpart. The similarities found between the Skhul permanent and deciduous teeth and the recent DM2, may reflect a similar growth pattern. This would contribute to earlier crown completion in the fossil M1.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cranial growth in the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus): A quantitative analysis using three dimensional coordinate dataAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1992
- Dental development of the Taung skull from computerized tomographyNature, 1987
- Patterns and rates of enamel growth in the molar teeth of early hominidsNature, 1987
- Variations in enamel thickness and structure in East African hominidsAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1986
- Re-evaluation of the age at death of immature fossil hominidsNature, 1985
- Ontogenesis and Morphological DiversificationAmerican Zoologist, 1980
- Growth of the human second lower deciduous molarArchives of Oral Biology, 1968
- Comparison of the development of the second deciduous molar and first permanent molar in manArchives of Oral Biology, 1967
- Dental Merism and Tooth DevelopmentJournal of Dental Research, 1967
- THE ONTOGENY OF MOLAR PATTERNBiological Reviews, 1956