Current treatment approaches to leishmaniasis
- 1 October 2003
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 16 (5) , 397-401
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00001432-200310000-00005
Abstract
The leishmaniases consist of cutaneous, mucosal, and visceral syndromes. The classic treatment is with pentavalent antimonials. The disadvantages of the antimonials are their requirement for intramuscular or intravenous injection each day for 20-28 days, their toxicity, and the recent development of resistance in regions such as India. Amphotericin B is a potent secondary agent, but is also compromised by its parenteral nature and toxicity. Clinical investigation of treatment agents from January 2000 to January 2003 is reviewed to determine if there are new agents that can be used. A large number of pilot studies on visceral and cutaneous leishmaniasis have been performed. There can be more confidence in the visceral studies because visceral disease is incurable if untreated, and because large numbers of patients have been treated in highly endemic regions such as India. There is less confidence in pilot studies of the cutaneous disease, because most are uncontrolled, and there is a variable, and often high, cure rate without treatment. Liposomal amphotericin B, which is injected infrequently and is easily tolerated, is virtually 100% effective for Indian visceral disease at a total dose of 15 mg/kg and is 90% effective at a dose of 5-10 mg/kg. The oral agent, miltefosine, is more than 95% effective for Indian visceral disease. Fluconazole treatment for 6 weeks speeds up the already-rapid cure rate of cutaneous disease due to Leishmania major.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Oral Miltefosine for Indian Visceral LeishmaniasisNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Low-dose liposomal amphotericin B in refractory Indian visceral leishmaniasis: a multicenter study.The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2002
- Ethiopian visceral leishmaniasis: generic and proprietary sodium stibogluconate are equivalent; HIV co-infected patients have a poor outcomeTransactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2001
- Treatment of Indian visceral leishmaniasis with single or daily infusions of low dose liposomal amphotericin B: randomised trial Commentary: cost and resistance remain issuesBMJ, 2001
- Failure of Pentavalent Antimony in Visceral Leishmaniasis in India: Report from the Center of the Indian EpidemicClinical Infectious Diseases, 2000
- A prospective randomized, comparative, open-label trial of the safety and efficacy of paromomycin (aminosidine) plus sodium stibogluconate versus sodium stibogluconate alone for the treatment of visceral leishmaniasisTransactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2000
- Treatment of visceral leishmaniasis with injectable paromomycin (aminosidine). An open-label randomized phase-II clinical studyTransactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2000
- A randomized comparison of branded sodium stibogluconate and generic sodium stibogluconate for the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis under field conditions in SudanTropical Medicine & International Health, 2000
- Short-course, cost-effective treatment with amphotericin B-fat emulsion cures visceral leishmaniasis.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2000
- A cluster of cases of severe cardiotoxicity among kala-azar patients treated with a high-osmolarity lot of sodium antimony gluconate.The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 1998