The Future of Public Health Law
- 1 January 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Journal of Law & Medicine
- Vol. 12 (3-4) , 461-490
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0098858800009771
Abstract
Developments in medicine and constitutional law dictate modification of public health legislation in the United States. Traditionally overlooked by legislators, present public health laws provide inadequate decisionmaking criteria and inappropriate procedures for dealing with issues. Revised legislation should provide health care officials and agencies with the tools to balance individual rights against public health necessities. This Article makes four recommendations for legislative reform: (1) remove artificial legislative distinction between venereal and other communicable diseases; (2) provide criteria denning “public health necessity” to limit discretionary exercise of police power by health officials; (3) provide strong confidentiality protections in the collection and storage of public health information; (4) empower public health officials to select from a graded series of less restrictive alternatives in dealing with public health problems.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Case Against Compulsory Casefinding in Controlling AIDS—Testing, Screening and ReportingAmerican Journal of Law & Medicine, 1987
- Bowers v. Hardwick: Precedent by Personal PredilectionThe University of Chicago Law Review, 1987
- AIDS and the Criminal LawLaw, Medicine and Health Care, 1987
- A Review of AIDS-Related Legislative and Regulatory Policy in the United StatesLaw, Medicine and Health Care, 1987
- The Constitutional Rights of AIDS CarriersHarvard Law Review, 1986
- The Future of Communicable Disease Control: Toward a New Concept in Public Health LawThe Milbank Quarterly, 1986
- The Constitutional Status of Sexual Orientation: Homosexuality as a Suspect ClassificationHarvard Law Review, 1985
- Developments in the Law: Civil Commitment of the Mentally IllHarvard Law Review, 1974